Introduction: As 2012 begins in earnest, Ilan Pappe’s words arecertainly 
worth reflecting on.  For too long have our leaders particularly, but also 
much of the public, been held in thrall by the dramatic Israel tableau  – 
biblical entitlement, land redemption, the light of the world – without any 
regard for the real human drama going on behind the pastiche of concocted 
stories.  Only very recently have the cracks begun to show a very ugly side 
to the Jewish narrative of longing for Zion and another people’s narrative 
that has been deliberately hidden and demonised.  Aside from the gross 
injustice Israel’s creation had perpetrated on the indigenous Palestinian 
population and society of the time and which its subsequent actions have 
never attempted to make right, Israel’s apartheid character is being exposed 
every day, and with it the quest for Jewish supremacy.  It is impossible to 
ignore when even Israel’s politicians are quite blatant about their 
intentions to make all of the land – historic Palestine - exclusively 
Jewish. 
 For more than 60 years, most Palestinians have been living as prisoners and 
pariahs in their own land or as stateless people caught frozen in time in 
the refugee camps still clinging to their inalienable right to return home. 
Others in the Diaspora may have been more fortunate, but it does not make 
the pain of loss, indignity and separation any less.   If Israel hoped to 
see the Palestinian identity ground into the soil of their homeland or 
wither away waiting to return, it is beginning to realise that no matter 
what atrocities or hardships it imposes on the Palestinians, these 
long-maligned people are not about to go quietly into the sunset.   Millions 
of Palestinian men, women and children have not forgotten, will not forget 
and remain steadfast in their determination to get justice.  Finally, public 
opinion is seeing Israel for what it is, but timidity and intimidation still 
prevent a good number from speaking out and holding Israel accountable.  Too 
many of our politicians, journalists and other public figures fear that 
their positions, ambitions and good standing will be compromised if they 
criticise Israel, so they “cower” says Ilan Pappe.  Turning public sentiment 
into political action is the challenge we face today.  It is not impossible. 
Sonja Karkar 
Editor
http://australiansforpalestine.com
Confronting intimidation, 
working for justice in Palestine
 by Ilan Pappe
The Electronic Intifada
9 February 2012
Demonstration in commemoration of the killing of Mustafa Tamimi,
 Nabi Salih, West Bank (16 December 2011). 
(Oren Ziv / ActiveStills)
If we had a wish list for 2012 as Palestinians and friends of Palestine, one 
of the top items ought to be our hope that we can translate the dramatic 
shift in recent years in world public opinion into political action against 
Israeli policies on the ground.
We know why this has not yet materialized: the political, intellectual and 
cultural elites of the West cower whenever they even contemplate acting 
according to their own consciences as well as the wishes of their societies.
 This last year was particularly illuminating for me in that respect. I 
encountered that timidity at every station in the many trips I took for the 
cause I believe in. And these personal experiences were accentuated by the 
more general examples of how governments and institutions caved in under 
intimidation from Israel and pro-Zionist Jewish organizations.
A catalogue of complicity
Of course there were US President Barack Obama’s [1] pandering appearances 
in front of AIPAC, [2] the Israeli lobby, and his administration’s continued 
silence and inaction in face of Israel’s colonization of the West Bank, 
siege and killings in Gaza, ethnic cleansing of the Bedouins [3]  in the 
Naqab [4]  and new legislation discriminating against Palestinians in 
Israel[5].
The complicity continued with the shameful retreat of Judge Richard 
Goldstone [6]  from his rather tame report on the Gaza massacre [7]  — which 
began three years ago today. And then there was the decision of European 
governments, especially Greece, [8] to disallow campaigns of human aid and 
solidarity from reaching Gaza by sea.
On the margins of all of this were prosecutions in France [9]  against 
activists calling for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) [10]  and a 
few u-turns by some groups and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in 
Europe caving in under pressure and retracting an earlier decision to cede 
connections with Israel.
Learning firsthand how pro-Israel intimidation works
In recent years, I have learned firsthand how intimidation of this kind 
works. In November 2009 the mayor of Munich was scared to death by a Zionist 
lobby group and cancelled my lecture there. More recently, the Austrian 
foreign ministry withdrew its funding for an event in which I participated, 
and finally it was my own university, the University of Exeter, once a haven 
of security in my eyes, becoming frigid when a bunch of Zionist hooligans 
claimed I was a fabricator and a self-hating Jew.
Every year since I moved there, Zionist organizations in the UK and the US 
have asked the university to investigate my work and were brushed aside. 
This year a similar appeal was taken, momentarily one should say, seriously. 
One hopes this was just a temporary lapse; but you never know with an 
academic institution (bravery is not one of their hallmarks).
Standing up to pressure 
But there were examples of courage — local and global — as well: the student 
union of the University of Surrey under heavy pressure to cancel my talk 
[11]  did not give in and allowed the event to take place.
The Episcopal Bishops Committee on Israel/Palestine in Seattle faced the 
wrath of many of the city’s synagogues and the Israeli Consul General in San 
Francisco, Akiva Tor, [12] for arranging an event with me in September 2011 
in Seattle’s Town Hall, but bravely brushed aside this campaign of 
intimidation. The usual charges of “anti-Semitism” did not work there — they 
never do where people refuse to be intimidated.
The outgoing year was also the one in which Turkey [13] imposed military and 
diplomatic sanctions on Israel in response to the latter’s refusal to take 
responsibility for the attack on the Mavi Marmara [14]. Turkey’s action was 
in marked contrast to the European and international habit of sufficing with 
toothless statements at best, and never imposing a real price on Israel for 
its actions.
Do not cave in to intimidation
 I do not wish to underestimate the task ahead of us. Only recently did we 
learn how much money is channeled to this machinery of intimidation whose 
sole purpose is to silence criticism on Israel. Last year, the Jewish 
Federations of North America [15]  and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs 
[16]  — leading pro-Israel lobby groups — allocated $6 million to be spent 
over three years to fight BDS campaigns and smear the Palestine solidarity 
movement. This is not the only such initiative under way.
But are these forces as powerful as they seem to be in the eyes of very 
respectable institutions such as universities, community centers, churches, 
media outlets and, of course, politicians?
What you learn is that once you cower, you become prey to continued and 
relentless bashing until you sing the Israeli national anthem. If once you 
do not cave in, you discover that as time goes by, the ability of Zionist 
lobbies of intimidation around the world to affect you gradually diminishes.
Reducing the influence of the United States 
 Undoubtedly the centers of power that fuel this culture of intimidation lie 
to a great extent in the United States, which brings me to the second item 
on my 2012 wish list: an end to the American dominance in the affairs of 
Israelis and Palestinians. I know this influence cannot be easily curbed.
But the issue of timidity and intimidation belong to an American sphere of 
activity where things can, and should be, different. There will be no peace 
process or even Pax Americana in Palestine if the Palestinians, under 
whatever leadership, would agree to allow Washington to play such a central 
role. It is not as if US policy-makers can threaten the Palestinians that 
without their involvement there will be no peace process.
In fact history has proved that there was no peace process — in the sense of 
a genuine movement toward the restoration of Palestinian rights — precisely 
because of American involvement. Outside mediation may be necessary for the 
cause of reconciliation in Palestine. But does it have to be American?
If elite politics are needed — along with other forces and movements — to 
facilitate a change on the ground, such a role should come from other places 
in the world and not just from the United States.
One would hope that the recent rapprochement between Hamas [17]  and Fatah 
[18] — and the new attempt to base the issue of Palestinian representation 
on a wider and more just basis — will lead to a clear Palestinian position 
that would expose the fallacy that peace can only be achieved with the 
Americans as its brokers.
Dwarfing the US role will disarm American Zionist bodies and those who 
emulate them in Europe and Israel of their power of intimidation.
Letting the other America play a role 
This will also enable the other America, that of the civil society, the 
Occupy Wall Street movement, [19] the progressive campuses, the courageous 
churches, African-Americans marginalized by mainstream politics, Native 
Americans and millions of other decent Americans who never fell captive to 
elite propaganda about Israel and Palestine, to take a far more central role 
in “American involvement” in Palestine.
That would benefit America as much as it will benefit justice and peace in 
Palestine. But this long road to redeeming all of us who want to see justice 
begins by asking academics, journalists and politicians in the West to show 
a modicum of steadfastness and courage in the face of those who want to 
intimidate us. Their bark is far fiercer than their bite.
The author of numerous books, Ilan Pappe is Professor of History and 
Director of the European Centre for Palestine Studies at the University of 
Exeter.
Footnotes
[1] <http://electronicintifada.net/tags/barack-obama>
[2] 
<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/aipac>
[3] 
<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/bedouin>
[4] 
<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/naqab>
[5] <http://electronicintifada.net/tags/palestinians-israel>
[6] 
 <http://electronicintifada.net/tags/richard-goldstone> 
[7]  <http://electronicintifada.net/tags/goldstone-report>
[8] 
<http://electronicintifada.net/content/how-greece-abandoned-palestine/10171> 
[9]  <http://electronicintifada.net/blog/ali-abunimah/blow-israel-french-bds-activists-acquitted-crime-calling-boycott>
[10]<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/bds>
[11] <http://electronicintifada.net/blog/ben-white/british-campus-watch-organisation-student-rights-attacks-palestine-solidarity>
[12]<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/akiva-tor>
[13] 
<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/turkey>
[14] 
<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/mavi-marmara>[15]<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/jewish-federations-north-america>
[16]<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/jewish-council-public-affairs> 
[17]<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/hamas>
[18]<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/fatah>
[19]<http://electronicintifada.net/tags/occupy-wall-street> 
   
ORIGINAL LINK:  http://electronicintifada.net/content/confronting-intimidation-working-justice-palestine/10746
AFP 
LINK:  http://www.australiansforpalestine.net/58286#more-58286